🔻 Ross Coulthart Praises the South American Approach to UFO Research

 

🔻 I invite anyone interested in the UFO phenomenon to watch the interview conducted by Fernando Silva with Ross Coulthart. I find particularly compelling the segment in which Ross is asked about the interaction of ORBS and about the investigations currently taking place in South America—a topic toward which he expresses both praise and genuine interest. We appreciate his openness not only to what is happening in the United States, but also to what is unfolding specifically in our region, where highly relevant cases continue to emerge.

This point is crucial, as it opens a window into the regional work that, despite its importance, does not always receive the visibility it deserves among peers. In this sense, I dare to state that the book Contacto de otra Dimensión represents one of the most thorough and systematic investigations into the specific phenomenon of Orbs or Orbit (a hypothesis developed within the text), presented as a documentary-style book and centered on an extremely recent incident that occurred in February 2023 in the Andes Mountain Range.

This case also includes one of the most revealing videos of recent times, perhaps comparable—depending on the authenticity of each record—only to the Kumburgaz video or the material captured by Michael Battista. In this recording, an anomaly can be observed that appears to metamorphose into various forms, including the manifestation of humanoid silhouettes.

For this reason, I believe this investigation deserves to be cited in a variety of journalistic, academic, and educational contexts, both for its descriptive value and for the strength of the audiovisual material presented. The frame-by-frame analysis occupies a central place in the book, enabling a much deeper understanding of the dynamics of the phenomenon and contributing valuable material to the corpus of documented cases in the region.

I invite specialized media—both national and international—to delve deeper into this investigation, because it is possibly—or may become—one of the most significant and revealing cases of recent years. This view does not stem solely from my personal experience; it is also supported by seasoned researchers such as Pablo Petrowitsch (former member of APROO) and other specialists who have recognized the relevance and consistency of the study.

The book brings together more than two years of field research, accompanied by meticulous analyses, detailed comparisons, audiovisual records, and technical evaluations that should be reviewed by all those seeking to understand the current landscape of the phenomenon. The material included—thoroughly documented and examined with methodological rigor—constitutes one of the strongest pieces of evidence for the existence of an anomaly that appears to coexist with us on this planet, interacting in specific contexts and allowing itself, for reasons still unknown, to be recorded with exceptional clarity in this incident.

The work is already available on Amazon, and in February 2026, it will also be released in its English edition, expanding its reach to a global audience deeply interested in this type of phenomenon.

Book link:

https://a.co/d/cyIcor4

A truly fascinating interview.

Kind regards,

Iván Vega Recabal

🔻 Reading Between the Lines: The Key to Understanding What Lies Behind the Documentary The Age of Disclosure

 

🔻 Reading Between the Lines: The Key to Understanding What Lies Behind the Documentary The Age of Disclosure

I just finished watching The Age of Disclosure and I want to share an honest reflection with you. Like many of you, I expected to find evidence—something that would finally break through years of speculation and silence. But what I saw was something else: a well‑produced presentation with many important names speaking… yet without showing anything truly new.

Yes, the same voices we already know appear: Luis Elizondo, David Grusch, Christopher Mellon, Ryan Graves, Alex Dietrich, Robert Salas, Daniel Sheehan, Ross Coulthart, Gary Nolan—all of them offering testimonies we’ve already heard in previous interviews, conferences, and leaks. I’m not saying it’s unimportant to gather them all in one documentary. It is. But when you go in expecting clear evidence—unreleased videos, recovered technology, irrefutable documents—and don’t get it, it’s impossible not to feel that this was just another carefully measured release of information, a form of controlled disclosure.

I say this respectfully, but clearly: it feels as if someone is choosing very carefully what we’re allowed to see and what we aren’t. And in that process, they treat us like an audience that must be prepared before facing the full truth. I’m not saying this because of senseless conspiracy theories, but because of the way the message was constructed.

The documentary drags on and becomes tedious at times. The same information, the same viewpoints, circling around the same ideas. Where is the evidence? Where are the proofs we’ve been waiting for all this time? I understand that not everything can be shown—that there are protocols, national security, and conflicting interests. But then, why make us sit for almost two hours if, in the end, everything stays in words?

One detail I can’t ignore is the role of Luis Elizondo, who in this documentary comes across more like a professor than a former intelligence official. It literally feels as if he’s standing in front of a chalkboard, giving us a lesson on where this phenomenon comes from and where, according to him, we should be looking. His tone is didactic, almost paternal. That’s not necessarily bad, but if you’ve been following this topic for a long time, that attitude can feel a bit condescending.

Don’t get me wrong—I’m not saying the documentary has no value. In fact, for those approaching this subject for the first time, it can be a solid entry point. But for those of us who have spent years tracking every development, every testimony, every leaked document, this feels like too little. Far too little.

This documentary confirms something many of us already suspected: disclosure is not going to come all at once, but in fragments—filtered, digested, and politically acceptable. And that, far from being exciting, is sometimes disappointing. Because we remain in the same place: with more words than evidence, with more gestures than certainty.

So if you plan to watch The Age of Disclosure, do it with your eyes wide open. Don’t cling only to what is said. Read between the lines. Notice what is omitted. Listen to what gets repeated. Because, as always, the truth remains just outside the frame.

By the way, there’s something I can’t stop thinking about. I’m convinced that if the case Contacto de otra Dimensión had been discovered in the United States—and had ended up in the hands of a well‑known investigator like George Knapp—it would already be making headlines around the world. I say this with full responsibility. The evidence contained in this case needs no embellishment; it is clear, direct, and visually undeniable. This is not speculation. The frames captured at that moment speak for themselves.

In that sense, Contact for Another Dimension—in its translated version—may actually have a stronger impact than the documentary I’m reviewing here. Because one thing is undeniable: people want evidence, not words.

Warm regards,

Iván Vega Recabal
www.contactodeotradimension.cl
In February 2026, the English version will be released.
AMAZON Book